Re: [DOCS] Business Plan for PostgreSQL book?
От | Henry B. Hotz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [DOCS] Business Plan for PostgreSQL book? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | v04020a1eb42badae23fb@[137.78.84.130] обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Business Plan for PostgreSQL book? ("Clark C. Evans" <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [DOCS] Business Plan for PostgreSQL book?
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
At 7:04 AM -0700 10/14/99, Clark C. Evans wrote: >Bruce, > >Were you going to do this as a "group" project or >is it a "solo" venture? > >If its a group project, I assume you are the "owner" >of the "uber-contract" until it sells to a book >publisher. To do this right, you would divide >this contract into small peices, or sub-contracts. >Then, as people contribute, their time is tracked >against these components. Right now, for instance, >you have a book-outline project which people are >working on; it could be decided that the book-outline >sub contract is worth ".5%" of the book ownership. >Then, as people track their time against these >sub-contracts, a summary (once a week) is presented >to you (the owner of the contract) for approval >of their hours. If approved, then the contributer The way this is normally done is to do a page or word count of the finished product. Each author owns a "chapter". The editor negotiates with the publisher and takes a cut off the top. Counting time is a bad idea IMHO. Too much uncertainty and inequity. Of course in this case there is a lot of pre-existing text which makes counting pages hard. Is there any way we can make this whole thing owned by postgresql.org and just use the proceeds for the project? I haven't been tracking the legal status. Signature failed Preliminary Design Review. Feasibility of a new signature is currently being evaluated. h.b.hotz@jpl.nasa.gov, or hbhotz@oxy.edu
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: